목차 1.Explaining 'Free Lunch Program' 2.From Nozick and Rawls' Point of View 3.Trade Off between equity & efficiency 4.Recommendation 본문 Measurements Satisfaction analysis about the Free Lunch Time order investigation about the teenager s nutrition status Rate of the poorly-fed children and the changes of GPA May be too subjective to apply too many variables Nozick Not equitable Limitations of freedom such as the right to get various kinds of foods or usage of economic resources. Movement of economic resources is occurred from lower income group to higher income group Rawls Equitable / Not Equitable Rawls argued that ensuring the basic level of resources is an essential factor for liberty 'Food means the minimum condition to live an ordinary life Rawls emphasized the social agreement when implementing any kind of policy Free Lunch program has been causing very severe controversy in people from all walks of life To improve social equity by relieving family budget and disharmony of every student The program is actually implemented through another tax it brings problems like quality degradation on school meals or manpower shortage Balloon Effect Diminishing the intermediate cost by direct connection with schools to rural societies Giving selective support which is providing Free Lunch to whom are really needed Parents who are relevant to Free Lunch program can apply to the district dong office personally Installing electronic information system on administration department in schools 키워드 유꾩꽍, 덉궛, PPT먮즺, 원곌원, 먭린됯, 뒿댁슜 |
2016년 7월 23일 토요일
Trade Off btw Equity & Efficiency
Trade Off btw Equity & Efficiency
피드 구독하기:
댓글 (Atom)
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기