목차 Argument 1 Argument 2 Argument 3 Conclusion 본문 Regarding this event, Ryan Calo said "When you have an I.P.O.(initial public offering) you don't want investors to be skeptical or jittery(신경질적인, 초조해하는)," "In order for you to be as valuable as possible, you want to make sure the seas are calm. This calms the seas." Ryan Calo is a Research Fellow at the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society. He also runs the Consumer Privacy Project and writes and lectures about robotics, including issues of liability and privacy. Basically, what he is saying is Facebook now have an IPO which is initial public offering, and they do not want to make their investors uncomfortable by getting involved in sensitive matters like a privacy issue. So Facebook will work on privacy matters and obviously not risk their profit for users privacy. This is the end of my part and 가람 will continue our argument regarding Analysis based on Export Sourcing and anology. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/technology/facebook-agrees-to-ftc-settlement-on-privacy.html 참고문헌 Icrossing The total active Facebook user number statistics Digital Marketing agency Emarketer Display advertisement revenues percentage for top 5- ad selling companies Internet World Stats Facebook growth statistics for 2011-2012 Moneycontrol.com 키워드 개인정보, 개인, 정보, 페이스북, 영문 |
2017년 5월 28일 일요일
페이스북과 개인정보 보호 (영문)
페이스북과 개인정보 보호 (영문)
피드 구독하기:
댓글 (Atom)
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기